Finn’s law

In October last year, a police dog called Finn was stabbed in the head and chest while chasing a suspect. For many people the charges brought in this awful case have highlighted a wider issue with the protections available in law for police animals.

People who attack a police animal can be charged under the Criminal Damages Act 1971. This legislation is designed to deal with destruction or damage to property, not animal cruelty. Those who attack police animals can also be charged under section 4 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006, which makes it a criminal offence to subject an animal to unnecessary suffering. The maximum punishment is six months in prison or a fine of up to £20,000, which is much lower than the maximum penalty of 10 years available under the Criminal Damages Act.

The ‘Finn’s Law’ campaign has said that police animals deserve better protection than property and I strongly agree.

Many people who work with police animals think the law is currently failing to offer that protection.

Police dogs and horses are not merely police property; they are sentient beings who bravely and loyally serve the public. The law should recognise them as such and give them the protection they undeniably deserve.

The government has said that ‘an additional offence dealing specifically with attacks on police animals or a move to change their legal status is unnecessary in light of the maximum penalties already in place. An additional and separate offence may not result in more prosecutions, or increased sentences.’

It is, of course,  good practice to avoid duplicating laws on the statute book. However, Ministers need to address the serious concerns about the legal protection afforded to animals working in the police service.

Following the success of the Finn’s Law campaign, the government has now agreed to explore whether there is more that the law should do to offer the most appropriate protections to police animals and all working animals.

I will continue to closely monitor any developments.