Torture inquiry

Allegations that members of our security and intelligence services may have been involved in the improper treatment of detainees held by other countries need proper and full investigation. Organisations such as Reprieve and others have called for a public inquiry into this issue.

An independent, judge-led inquiry was established in 2010, led by Sir Peter Gibson. However, because of police investigations, this was abandoned in 2012 and followed up by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) of Parliament.

After a nearly five-year inquiry into detainee mistreatment and rendition, the ISC recently published two reports – one looking at the 2001-2010 period and another looking at current issues. These reports uncovered new findings but the ISC was denied access to individuals, severely limiting its ability to give comprehensive answers to the questions that remain. The ISC also criticised ongoing inadequacies on guidance relating to torture and rendition. I support a fresh judge-led inquiry to get to the bottom of these issues once and for all.

Our security and intelligence services do an outstanding job, often taking significant personal risks and operating across the world in circumstances they do not control. It is vital that we allow them to act to protect our country, but we must do so in a way that is consistent with the law and our unequivocal commitment to human rights.

The government has said it will consider calls for a new judge-led inquiry following the publication of the ISC’s reports and I look forward to the government’s formal response to these later this year.